Search
Taxpayers often file returns at multiple levels, but federal and state systems serve distinct purposes. Recognizing these nuances can reduce surprises and inform smarter choices.
From the way rates are set to the programs they support, federal and state taxes follow separate paths. Grasping their foundations is essential for anyone navigating the American tax landscape.
At the federal level, taxes are levied and collected by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS). These funds fund national programs and services such as defense, Social Security, and public health initiatives.
State taxes, by contrast, are managed by state revenue departments. They bankroll roads, schools, law enforcement, parks, and other local services that impact daily life.
The United States employs two main approaches to income tax: progressive brackets and flat rates. Both systems coexist at the state level, while the federal government relies solely on progression.
Progressive income tax system means that as income rises, so does the rate applied to each additional dollar earned. In 2024, federal brackets range from 10% to 37%. These rates remain consistent across all states.
A handful of states distinguish themselves by offering relief on wage taxes. While federal law taxes all forms of income, these states choose alternative revenue streams.
Residents in these jurisdictions often pay higher property or sales taxes to compensate for the revenue gap.
Consider a single filer earning $75,000 in wages and $3,000 in interest. Federally, this individual pays across brackets totaling $11,553, resulting in an effective rate of 15.4%. State results vary drastically:
• In New Hampshire, only the $3,000 of interest is taxed beyond a $2,400 exemption. The liability: $18—an effective state rate of 0.03%.
• A Utah resident faces a flat-rate system of 4.55%, translating to $3,549 in state tax on all taxable income.
• In Maryland and Massachusetts, multiple brackets push rates from 4% up to 9% for high earners, demonstrating how structure shapes outcomes.
While federal brackets for 2024 max out at 37%, state ceilings can climb even higher in progressive systems, or stay uniform in flat-rate states.
Both levels tax earned wages and unearned investment income, but definitions vary. Federal taxable income is standardized nationwide, offering either a standard deduction or itemized deductions.
States may choose to align with federal definitions or craft their own. Some allow taxpayers to deduct federal taxes paid, while others disallow that credit. Credits, exemptions, and phase-outs differ widely by state.
The Sixteenth Amendment grants Congress authority to tax income without apportionment among the states. Federal tax law is uniform and applies across the nation.
States derive their taxing power from their own constitutions. While some laws mirror federal language for simplicity, each state maintains its independent code and can adjust rules as desired.
All taxpayers meeting income thresholds must file federal returns. State filing obligations hinge on residency and where income is earned. Multi-state earners may need separate returns in each jurisdiction.
Residency status—full, part-year, or nonresident—influences which wages and investment earnings are taxed by a given state.
States with low or no income tax rely on alternative levies to balance budgets and fund services. Understanding these can shed light on overall tax burdens.
Comparing these systems highlights how structure, purpose, and rates shape taxpayer obligations. A clear view of both levels empowers better financial planning and long-term decisions.
Keep these essentials in mind as you prepare to file or adjust your withholding:
References
